Traditionen der Informatik: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Zeile 7: | Zeile 7: | ||
==Referenzen== | ==Referenzen== | ||
<references /> | <references />Brooks, F.P. Jr. (1996). The computer scientist as toolsmith II. Communications of the ACM, 39(3), 61–68 | ||
Denning, P.J. (Chairman), Comer, D.E., Gries, D., Mulder, M.C., Tucker, A., Turner, A.J., & Young, P.R. (1989). Computing as a discipline. Communications of the ACM, 32(1), 9–23 | |||
Dijkstra, E.W. (1972). The humble programmer. Communications of the ACM, 15(10), 859–866 Dijkstra, E.W. (1989). On the cruelty of really teaching computer science. Communications of the | |||
ACM, 32(12), 1398–1404 Hoare, C.A.R. (1969). An axiomatic basis for computer programming. Communications of the ACM, 12(10), 576–580 | |||
Holloway, C.M. (1995). Software engineering and epistemology. ACM SIGSOFT Software | |||
Engineering Notes, 20(2), 20–21 | |||
Tedre, M., Sutinen, E. (2008) Three traditions of computing: what educators should know | |||
[[Kategorie:Lehrinhalt]] | [[Kategorie:Lehrinhalt]] |
Version vom 14. Januar 2022, 09:20 Uhr
Hier folgen Informationen über Traditionen der Informatik... (hier ein kurzer Überblick)
Gewählte Überschrift...
Hier beschreibt ihr die Traditionen
Referenzen
<references />Brooks, F.P. Jr. (1996). The computer scientist as toolsmith II. Communications of the ACM, 39(3), 61–68
Denning, P.J. (Chairman), Comer, D.E., Gries, D., Mulder, M.C., Tucker, A., Turner, A.J., & Young, P.R. (1989). Computing as a discipline. Communications of the ACM, 32(1), 9–23
Dijkstra, E.W. (1972). The humble programmer. Communications of the ACM, 15(10), 859–866 Dijkstra, E.W. (1989). On the cruelty of really teaching computer science. Communications of the
ACM, 32(12), 1398–1404 Hoare, C.A.R. (1969). An axiomatic basis for computer programming. Communications of the ACM, 12(10), 576–580
Holloway, C.M. (1995). Software engineering and epistemology. ACM SIGSOFT Software
Engineering Notes, 20(2), 20–21
Tedre, M., Sutinen, E. (2008) Three traditions of computing: what educators should know